Searching for a middle ground? A spectrum of views of causality in qualitative research

Abstract Qualitative scholars exhibit a wide range of views on and approaches to causality. While some reject causality from the outset, large strand qualitative research in political science international relations does, however, pursue causal explanation. nevertheless disagree about what means. Our paper reviews means within different strands how engage explanations. We focus particular attention fertile middle ground between that seeks mimic statistical model rejects entirely. In broad strokes, we understand as lying spectrum partly overlapping. Along spectrum, identify three main clusters: ‘positivist leaning,’ ‘postpositivist ‘interpretivist leaning.’ Within each cluster, traits provide illustrative examples. find merit these clusters ongoing dialogue among orientations. Understanding similarities differences way various address might encourage take steps along expand their repertoires embrace elements other approaches. By making distinctions more explicit, hope be able enhance our understanding extent which they overlap potential for collaboration.